by Matthew Bransgrove | Sep 30, 2015 | The Judiciary
A constitution is useless if judges are determined to create rights and doctrines (or ignore rights and doctrines) in defiance of the constitution’s plain meaning. Such judicial activism replaces the constitution with the arbitrary rule of unelected judges,...
by Matthew Bransgrove | Sep 30, 2015 | The Judiciary
There is nothing more dangerous than the common axiom, “the spirit of the laws is to be considered.” To adopt it is to give way to the torrent of opinions. —Cesare Beccaria. Of Crimes and Punishments, 1764 Judges should give words their plain meaning even if that...
by Matthew Bransgrove | Sep 30, 2015 | The Judiciary
The dignity and stability of government in all its branches, the morals of the people and every blessing of society depend so much upon an upright and skilful administration of justice. —John Adams. Thoughts on Government, 1776. There are two types of judicial...
by Matthew Bransgrove | Sep 30, 2015 | The Judiciary
First-time judges should be chosen from amongst trial lawyers. Those doing the choosing should be guided by the opinions of senior members of the bar and bench. These opinions should be formally sought but confidentially given. Judges should generally be chosen from...
by Matthew Bransgrove | Sep 30, 2015 | The Judiciary
Members of the judiciary must maintain the dignity that befits their office. Litigants are comforted by having their fate decided by a somber technician of the law rather than by a buffoon. In particular, statutes should ensure that judges must not: Enter or leave...
by Matthew Bransgrove | Sep 30, 2015 | The Judiciary
Some judges have a comprehensive grasp of the law. They deal efficiently with trial after trial and deliver perfectly reasoned judgments founded on precedent. Then there are the sluggards, the ones who reserve judgments for months on end, sleep during trials, make...
